Prohibition of Flag Desecration is Unconstitutional :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Preclusion of Flag Desecration is Unconstitutional At the point when individuals fix their eyes upon the fifty white stars and thirteen red and white stripes, they see a nation’s banner, yet an image that speaks to opportunity and solidarity. America, the nation of chance and freedom, is based on a majority rules system controlled by the Bill of Rights. In the event that this banner speaks to the place where there is the free, at that point for what reason does Congress keep on ignoring the First Amendment and endeavor to pry a privilege out of American citizens’ hands? After Texas v. Johnson in 1989, when the Supreme Court contradicted the new banner consuming revision, the state rules forbidding banner contamination additionally were struck down. From that point forward, Congress has attempted to pass The Flag Desecration Amendment in 1990, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, and 2003. The Flag Desecration Amendment expresses that â€Å"The Congress and the states will have capacity to restrict the physical despoiling of the banner of the United States.† This alteration is viewed as illegal in light of the fact that it restrains how residents communicate and their thoughts. As per Professor Robert Justin Goldstein, just forty-five episodes of defilement have been recorded more than a long time since our banner was embraced. Our banner is in no impending peril, and numerous individuals bolster it by showing it on vehicles, structures, and homes. Indeed, most of the burnings speak to issues or strategies of the legislature, and not contempt towards the nation. For instance, in 1970, protestors consumed banners to seethe against imperialistic international strategies and the Vietnam War. In spite of the fact that the profaning of our nation’s image is debilitating, securing our Bill of Rights ought to be Congress’s top need. Since the reception of the Bill of Rights in 1791, none of the first articles have been modified. The First Amendment unmistakably expresses that Congress can't set up a law that meddles with the ability to speak freely, the opportunity of press, or the opportunity to amass a dissent.